<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Sound Money on Mr.Yam</title><link>https://mr.nickyam.com/tags/sound-money/</link><description>Recent content in Sound Money on Mr.Yam</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 16:53:00 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://mr.nickyam.com/tags/sound-money/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Bitcoin's Fixed Supply: Why Saifedean Ammous Says It's a Feature, Not a Flaw</title><link>https://mr.nickyam.com/Crypto/Bitcoin-Fixed-Supply-Feature-Not-a-Flaw/</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 16:53:00 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://mr.nickyam.com/Crypto/Bitcoin-Fixed-Supply-Feature-Not-a-Flaw/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;On Wednesday Bitcoin hovered in a narrow 83k–84k range, the kind of quiet consolidation that gives the tape-watchers little to talk about. Off the chart, a livelier contest was playing out between two economists over whether Bitcoin&amp;rsquo;s fixed supply is a bug or a feature.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The spark was economist Lawrence H. White&amp;rsquo;s 2023 book &lt;em&gt;Better Money: Gold, Fiat, or Bitcoin?&lt;/em&gt;, one chapter of which argues that Bitcoin&amp;rsquo;s fixed supply makes it too volatile to serve as a medium of exchange. Saifedean Ammous, author of &lt;em&gt;The Bitcoin Standard&lt;/em&gt;, recently published a point-by-point rebuttal. [1]&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>