<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Risk on Mr.Yam</title><link>https://mr.nickyam.com/tags/risk/</link><description>Recent content in Risk on Mr.Yam</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2026 12:03:00 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://mr.nickyam.com/tags/risk/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Quantum Fear Is Capping Bitcoin's Price: Sentiment, Not Science</title><link>https://mr.nickyam.com/Crypto/Quantum-Fear-Suppressing-Bitcoin-Price/</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2026 12:03:00 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://mr.nickyam.com/Crypto/Quantum-Fear-Suppressing-Bitcoin-Price/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Thursday morning, Bitcoin kept oscillating around $80k. Price would dip, then climb back, then dip again — a back-and-forth tug of war, with volume no higher than the day before. The tape was unusually quiet, carrying something of the dullness of a late bear market. For some, this is garbage time; for others, it is a window to prepare.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;According to Cointelegraph, Muneeb Ali, the founder of Stacks, recently said on the &lt;em&gt;Chain Reaction&lt;/em&gt; podcast that quantum fear has effectively put a ceiling on Bitcoin&amp;rsquo;s growth [1]. His argument: because quantum computing remains without a definitive answer, risk-averse institutions keep pushing their large purchases further and further back — all the way until developers produce a credible post-quantum roadmap. He delivered the line without heat, almost as if describing something already in motion.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>