<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Post-Quantum on Mr.Yam</title><link>https://mr.nickyam.com/tags/post-quantum/</link><description>Recent content in Post-Quantum on Mr.Yam</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2026 17:29:00 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://mr.nickyam.com/tags/post-quantum/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Bitcoin's Quantum Dilemma: Who Decides Satoshi's Exposed Coins?</title><link>https://mr.nickyam.com/Crypto/Bitcoins-Quantum-Dilemma-Who-Decides-Satoshis-Coins/</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2026 17:29:00 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://mr.nickyam.com/Crypto/Bitcoins-Quantum-Dilemma-Who-Decides-Satoshis-Coins/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;On Tuesday, Bitcoin nudged lower around the $81k line, the tape as grindy as ever. Away from the price action, the quantum-computing front saw fresh movement — the latest turn in a story we have followed about &lt;a href="https://mr.nickyam.com/Crypto/The-Quantum-Sword-Honed-by-AI/"&gt;the quantum threat to Bitcoin&amp;rsquo;s signatures&lt;/a&gt;. On October 16, nine blockchain companies announced the formation of the Quantum Alliance, a body meant to set a set of quantum-safety testing standards for blockchains, wallets, and infrastructure.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>